
DAILY
NEWS
Harvard dentist investigated
School launches probe after accusations that faculty
member misrepresented fluoride-cancer study
The Harvard School of Dental Medicine
announced last week that it is investigating a faculty
member after the watchdog Environmental Working Group (EWG)
accused him of
misrepresenting a study by a former student that
reported that fluoride in drinking water increases the risk
of bone cancer in young boys.
According to the EWG,
Chester Douglass, Harvard's chair of the Department of
Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, said in a report to the
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
that the still-unpublished study, by former student Elise
Bassin, showed that there was no relationship between
fluoride and bone cancer.
However, EWG's Mike Casey told The
Scientist that a summary of Bassin's work, now available
on the
EWG Web site, showed exactly the opposite, suggesting
that Douglass is "misrepresenting, quite badly, research
that he signed off on." As to the researcher's motives for
doing so, Casey noted that Douglass is the editor of a
newsletter called the
Colgate Oral Care Report, funded by Colgate-Palmolive,
which makes fluoride-containing toothpaste.
Casey said that EWG has filed a complaint
with the NIEHS and called Harvard to apprise the school of
their actions. Both Douglass and Bassin declined to comment
for this article.
A Harvard spokesperson told The
Scientist that the school is assembling an inquiry
committee to investigate the charges, and plans to work with
the NIEHS. "The Harvard School of Dental Medicine takes all
allegations of misconduct seriously and has a standard
system for reviewing allegations of research impropriety,"
the spokesperson said.
Although Bassin's paper is not yet
published, a summary on the EWG Web site says that the
report showed a nearly 5-fold higher risk of osteosarcoma in
boys who, at age 7, drank water containing 30% to 99% of the
amount of fluoride recommended by the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). When boys drank water
containing at least 100% of the recommended amount of
fluoride, their risk jumped to more than seven times that of
unexposed boys.
Casey said that the EWG learned about
Bassin's report when they heard that members of a National
Academy of Sciences panel discussing osteosarcoma and
fluoride were having difficulty getting access to Bassin's
research. The EWG looked into the matter further and found
"stark contradictions" between Bassin's alleged results and
Douglass' presentation of them, Casey noted.
For example, in a report to NIEHS, which
gave Douglass money from 1992 to 1999 as part of the
"Fluoride Exposure and Osteosarcoma" project, he writes that
an "analysis carried out for an Orthopedic Surgery Research
meeting reported an odds ratio of 1.2 to 1.4 between
fluoride and osteosarcoma that was not significantly
different from 1." One of the two references Douglass
includes in the report is Bassin's 2001 thesis, which he
approved, although it is not clear where any of the data
points he cites are taken from.
According to Douglass' report, he and his
colleagues found no significant link between fluoride and
bone cancer when they examined patient records from
orthopedic surgery departments across the United States, and
matched cases to controls with different tumors and nontumor
controls. To investigate exposure to fluoride, Douglass and
his team used CDC fluoridation census data and direct
information from regions where cases and controls lived.
Casey noted that the EWG recently released
a review of scientific research, including Bassin's, on
fluoride in drinking water that showed a "pretty clear link"
between fluoride and osteosarcoma. Still, the EWG isn't
"organizationally opposed" to fluoride, Casey said. "We're
saying this is what the science says. People can draw their
own conclusions."
Martin Mahoney of the Roswell Park Cancer
Institute and State University of New York, Buffalo, has
studied the effects of fluoride in drinking water and found
no link between bone cancer and fluoridation. He reviewed
the EWG site for The Scientist and said there is not
enough information to make any conclusions about Bassin's
research, nor Douglass' conduct. He questioned why Bassin's
work had not yet been published, given that she completed it
in 2001.
G.G. Steiner, of Steiner Laboratories in
Kapolei, Hawaii, told The Scientist that he has
reviewed every published paper to date on fluoride and
cancer and has found no sign that fluoride increases the
risk of bone cancer. "It's really a dead issue about
fluoride and cancer in science," he said. Steiner, who sells
fluoride for use during bone graft surgery, said he has even
published research showing that cancer rates appear to
decrease as fluoride levels in water increase, suggesting
fluoride might actually protect against cancer.
Steiner added that many people are against
adding fluoride to water because they don't like having
something forced on them, and simply having a connection to
Colgate doesn't make Douglass guilty of wrongdoing. "Just
because of that, you can't make a leap that he's covering
something up," he said.
Links for this article
M.C. Mahoney et al., "Bone cancer incidence
rates in New York State: time trends and
fluoridated drinking water supplies,"
Am J
Public Health 81:475-9, 1991. [
PubMed
Abstract]
G.G. Steiner, "Cancer incidence rates and
environmental factors: an ecological study,"
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 21(3):205-12,
2002. [
PubMed
Abstract]